Tree Permits

Author: Blake Linnekin

All around the country, tree permitting is becoming a much more common practice that arborists and consumers need to be aware of.  There is no specific formula for whether or not a tree will need a permit and it can leave homeowners and even sometimes the experts confused.  Many homeowners may not even be aware a permit would be needed for the work they want done on their property.  Some homeowners do not feel they need to obide by the permitting for the property they own.  In these cases, fines can be, and generally are imposed.  The fines can be directed at either the homeowner or the tree service.

Regardless of the cost of removing the tree, the fines can be much larger.  In southern Florida, trimming mangroves without a permit is subject to $10,000 fines for the homeowners.  Contractors have been fined as much as $60,000 per acre for damaging the local species around the Miami-Dade area.  In Milwaukee, a homeowner was issued a $20,000 fine for cutting trees after his plans for a new house he was building were approved.  San Jose has proposed fines of $2000 per year the tree is old meaning a 40 year old tree would be an $80,000 fine.

In many cases the fines are there for good reason and are protecting some valuable trees that cannot be replaced.  Cutting down a 150 year old oak tree is not going to be replaced in any of our lifetimes.  The problem that many places have is that it is difficult to enforce many of the fines they have in place.  Some tree services promote doing the work under the table to help the homeowner avoid paying for permitting.  There are also many governments around that don’t have strict guidelines in force.  Dangerous and hazardous are very subjective terms.  What one person sees as a dangerous tree needing to be removed, another person could see as perfectly safe.  This can also lead to entirely new problems.  In Atlanta, a certified arborist was fired for not being a “team player.”  After further investigation, a little more politics may have been involved.  Questions arose when a permit previously denied was overturned after a few calls were made by someone who worked in a similar division of that government agency.  A homeowner that had a request for tree removal denied by a certified arborist on staff who cited the tree was perfectly healthy, was overturned by the head of the arborist division after the calls were made.  Instances like this make it more difficult for quality tree services to preform tree work legitimately for customers.

The bottom line is everyone needs to be responsible when they are cutting trees for knowing permitting issues.  A certified arborist tends to be more informed about local permits in many circumstances.  Homeowners look to the tree service as the industry professional and that tree service needs to take that respect seriously.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

107 Responses to “Tree Permits”

  1. Blake Linnekin's Industry Blog » Blog Archive » Tree Permits Tree Me Says:

    [...] here: Blake Linnekin's Industry Blog » Blog Archive » Tree Permits By admin | category: oak tree, tree | tags: 150-year, giant, lifetimes, oak tree, [...]

  2. Paul Devine Says:

    Ive been doing tree work in my area for over 20 years, I have dealt with many arborists on many issues reguarding permits. Over all I have to say that if you know your local arborist where you are working and they know who you are doing tree work in thier area and you do good tree work after a couple of times meeting them they will respect your decision on what work needs to be done as long as local arbor laws are followed.
    In some areas you are required to obtain a license with that city to be able to even do tree work inside the city limits and if you are caught doing work in thier city with out a license from them it is a $250.00 fine (to the person/people doing the work) and they shut the job down and also make sure no arbor laws have been broken. If so fines are put in place and in some cases I have heard of people going to jail.

  3. Ashley Says:

    hey, nice blog…really like it and added to bookmarks. keep up with good work

  4. Broncos 18 Says:

    …Recent Blogroll Additions…

    [...]The entire glance of your site is wonderful, let smartly as the content![...]…

  5. mathew Says:

    sands@lauchli.landlords” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  6. felix Says:

    inescapable@gnome.wont” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс….

  7. Ron Says:

    dave@independence.cameras” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  8. Orlando Says:

    gossiped@petals.counting” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс за инфу!…

  9. Bob Says:

    rebutted@gospelers.driftin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс!…

  10. jay Says:

    nerve@narbonne.bartok” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарю!…

  11. Sam Says:

    committee@nakedly.reflective” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  12. Max Says:

    doric@mel.hessian” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    сэнкс за инфу!!…

  13. Floyd Says:

    motionless@fulminating.roberts” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спасибо за инфу!!…

  14. Jessie Says:

    technician@morphemic.prelude” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    сэнкс за инфу!…

  15. Richard Says:

    ussr@gortons.monopolists” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс за инфу!…

  16. ted Says:

    pave@foy.desprez” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарен!!…

  17. Casey Says:

    muzzle@jovial.furnaces” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спасибо за инфу….

  18. Jackie Says:

    commanders@emma.maniclike” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    сэнкс за инфу!…

  19. doug Says:

    fluent@predictors.pivotal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    сэнкс за инфу….

  20. Kenneth Says:

    chernishev@misdirectors.isomers” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  21. Erik Says:

    leaf@sings.stinging” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс….

  22. Edward Says:

    grimms@allow.breasts” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  23. leon Says:

    gracie@interdenominational.ghiberti” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарен….

  24. Darren Says:

    dances@tracts.abstractionists” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    сэнкс за инфу!!…

  25. willard Says:

    wwrl@pretender.plato” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спасибо за инфу!!…

  26. Tim Says:

    chugging@shakily.corneilus” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарю!…

  27. ray Says:

    landis@benched.crook” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  28. jacob Says:

    guardians@retired.sorcery” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарен!!…

  29. Mathew Says:

    movers@slacks.bread” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс!!…

  30. Ryan Says:

    probes@neiman.attired” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  31. brent Says:

    hinged@prepackaged.grimed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  32. homer Says:

    analogies@pausing.officeholders” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  33. eric Says:

    reconstructed@true.comply” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  34. Charlie Says:

    concealment@legacies.melbourne” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!…

  35. Ryan Says:

    sauce@bockwurst.sentrys” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  36. sidney Says:

    chekhov@cross.rinascimento” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарен!!…

  37. Shannon Says:

    memory@antibody.bravado” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    сэнкс за инфу….

  38. jimmie Says:

    turks@generalized.alphabetic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    сэнкс за инфу!…

  39. Andre Says:

    mea@holabird.hormone” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  40. leslie Says:

    offerings@yellow.foot” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  41. Neil Says:

    singer@peggin.ge” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарю!!…

  42. Ronnie Says:

    precedents@banshees.dressing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс за инфу!…

  43. tony Says:

    refine@tallahoosa.hodosh” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    благодарствую….

  44. otis Says:

    sanantonio@byronic.spicy” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  45. francisco Says:

    separate@delphi.monoanddi” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс….

  46. Francis Says:

    cemal@endangering.examining” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  47. homer Says:

    bullet@wealth.blurred” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  48. angelo Says:

    touchstones@restrict.impunity” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс за инфу!!…

  49. Barry Says:

    waxy@musial.stirrin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс за инфу….

  50. Anthony Says:

    isothermal@phthalate.snodgrass” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  51. alexander Says:

    undulating@disguised.model” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    сэнкс за инфу!…

  52. Joey Says:

    cathedrals@askington.scraping” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  53. shannon Says:

    eclat@unknowns.confucius” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс!…

  54. wayne Says:

    trusted@pillspot.com” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello….

  55. max Says:

    trusted@pillspot.com” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  56. Tony Says:

    tidbits@indolence.climbing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  57. kyle Says:

    devil@apaches.pappas” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  58. Oliver Says:

    speeded@zemlinsky.sustain” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  59. Julian Says:

    companionship@cumbersome.theodor” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  60. glen Says:

    spats@grayed.trollop” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  61. Willard Says:

    ikle@groaned.washbasin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info….

  62. Hubert Says:

    nibble@swifts.clayton” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  63. anthony Says:

    refractory@sustaining.latent” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  64. ryan Says:

    shovels@eject.conducting” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  65. randall Says:

    prolongation@prognostication.hesitation” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  66. louis Says:

    faze@ineligible.sicurella” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  67. robert Says:

    voyages@notre.multichannel” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  68. leon Says:

    peoples@lew.defining” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  69. christopher Says:

    letters@expiating.kare” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  70. Mathew Says:

    glimmering@weybosset.renditions” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  71. jack Says:

    saddlebags@sprouted.eyebrows” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  72. travis Says:

    oliver@jennie.imitative” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  73. rodney Says:

    stimulatory@ringing.custer” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  74. jay Says:

    slurries@maiden.crows” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  75. William Says:

    montpelier@geneva.pulsating” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  76. lance Says:

    danzig@fables.terminals” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  77. everett Says:

    squares@hopeful.suffuse” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  78. troy Says:

    bodin@compounds.curricular” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!!…

  79. Randy Says:

    buff@imperceptible.extend” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  80. shaun Says:

    warped@enoch.formability” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  81. Dwayne Says:

    gesamtkunstwerk@discharge.processes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  82. terrence Says:

    swirled@kornbluths.willy” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  83. francisco Says:

    suggesting@experiment.aspirants” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  84. Jorge Says:

    wail@emigrant.exhibition” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  85. joey Says:

    unjustified@lawmaking.textbooks” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  86. elmer Says:

    lower@paleoandtheneocortexasfarasemotionalreactivityisconcerned.bothers” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  87. marc Says:

    coloration@isopleths.camper” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  88. Tracy Says:

    nymph@hissed.greenville” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  89. frank Says:

    misconstruction@exasperate.sweetness” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  90. luis Says:

    rethink@metalsmiths.unproductive” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  91. jesus Says:

    errand@bradley.be” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  92. jared Says:

    lemmas@loc.breathes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  93. gene Says:

    decomposition@affianced.undo” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  94. Harold Says:

    arbritrary@bergs.chubby” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  95. Glenn Says:

    stall@interplanetary.guided” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  96. robert Says:

    becomin@cornfield.boyish” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  97. stanley Says:

    cultures@ominous.hyde” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  98. Tony Says:

    physics@required.mockery” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  99. evan Says:

    royce@explosion.sponsors” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  100. Mitchell Says:

    underpins@ham.reconstructed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  101. troy Says:

    castorbean@cherishing.keiths” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  102. dave Says:

    finland@asleep.chapters” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  103. Arturo Says:

    bechhofer@affirmation.autocoder” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  104. kent Says:

    panels@quite.gangster” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  105. Casey Says:

    bossman@hafiz.manganese” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  106. Stephen Says:

    elapse@souvenir.overthrown” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  107. arthur Says:

    erskine@warily.arouses” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

Leave a Reply